Empirical evidence for the relevance of fractional scoring in the calculation of percentile rank scores

Michael Schreiber

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, vol. 64, issue 4, 861-867

Abstract: Fractional scoring has been proposed to avoid inconsistencies in the attribution of publications to percentile rank classes. Uncertainties and ambiguities in the evaluation of percentile ranks can be demonstrated most easily with small data sets. But for larger data sets, an often large number of papers with the same citation count leads to the same uncertainties and ambiguities, which can be avoided by fractional scoring, demonstrated by four different empirical data sets with several thousand publications each, which are assigned to six percentile rank classes. Only by utilizing fractional scoring does, the total score of all papers exactly reproduce the theoretical value in each case.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22774

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:4:p:861-867

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().