A Comparative Analysis of the Market Model and the Multiple‐Factor Market Model

Teresa L. Conover

Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1997, vol. 24, issue 5, 657-666

Abstract: This study uses the framework of Patell (1979) to determine whether a multiple‐factor market model or a traditional market model is more effective for information content studies of multinational firms. The multiple‐factor market model is found to be superior to the traditional market model. Researchers wishing to test for information content for events with long event windows should consider using multiple factor models rather than the traditional market model, as it will increase the power of the test.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00127

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:24:y:1997:i:5:p:657-666

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-686X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Finance & Accounting is currently edited by P. F. Pope, A. W. Stark and M. Walker

More articles in Journal of Business Finance & Accounting from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().