The Theory‐Practice Gap in Capital Budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom

Glen C. Arnold and Panos D. Hatzopoulos

Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2000, vol. 27, issue 5‐6, 603-626

Abstract: We report the results of a survey of capital budgeting techniques used by United Kingdom firms. Where possible, the evidence is combined with data collected over a 22 year period to provide a basis for the discussion of causes of trends. We observe that there has been a substantial narrowing of the theory‐practice gap in the use of project appraisal methods. The gap has also narrowed in other areas: the analysis of risk, inflation adjustment, capital budget preparation, WACC calculation and post‐auditing. However, there are other elements of capital budgeting theory, e.g. probability and beta analysis which have been adopted by very few practising managers. We also discuss non‐economic projects, capital rationing and hurdle rates.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (39)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00327

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:27:y:2000:i:5-6:p:603-626

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-686X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Finance & Accounting is currently edited by P. F. Pope, A. W. Stark and M. Walker

More articles in Journal of Business Finance & Accounting from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().