Legal Liabilities, Audit Accuracy and the Market for Audit Services
Sankar De and
Pradyot K. Sen
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2002, vol. 29, issue 3‐4, 353-410
In quality‐differentiated audit markets with client‐firms of unknown types, insider‐managers of client firms strategically select auditors who respond to legal liabilities to decide their care level. In this signaling game, uninformed‐investors use the audit report and the auditors' identity for firm valuation. The analysis shows that increased legal liability increases the auditor's effort and audit accuracy but reduces the demand for high quality auditing because, apart from the increased audit costs, the adverse selection benefit of the worse type reduces with increased accuracy. Furthermore, alternative legal regimes and damage allocation rules alter informational efficiency of the financial market.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:29:y:2002:i:3-4:p:353-410
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-686X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting is currently edited by P. F. Pope, A. W. Stark and M. Walker
More articles in Journal of Business Finance & Accounting from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().