Determinants of Actuarial Valuation Method Changes for Pension Funding and Reporting: Evidence from the UK
Paul J.M. Klumpes and
Mark Whittington
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2003, vol. 30, issue 1‐2, 175-204
Abstract:
This study examines various factors that potentially explain cross‐sectional variations in UK corporate managerial discretion to switch towards a market‐based actuarial pension valuation method for pension funding and reporting purposes. Evidence is based on accounting, actuarial and share market data for an industry‐matched pair sample of 90 UK firms. Consistent with our hypotheses we find that companies have a greater propensity to switch actuarial methods if they use lower discount rates, lower flow funding ratios and sponsor larger pension plans in the pre‐switch valuation year. These findings are consistent with the traditional perspective, which implies that UK corporate switching decisions are explained by characteristics of their defined benefit pension funds. The results run contrary to the findings of earlier US based studies that find that such choices can be explained from an alternative corporate financial perspective.
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00488
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:30:y:2003:i:1-2:p:175-204
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-686X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting is currently edited by P. F. Pope, A. W. Stark and M. Walker
More articles in Journal of Business Finance & Accounting from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().