UK IPOs: Long Run Returns, Behavioural Timing and Pseudo Timing
Cherif Guermat and
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2010, vol. 37, issue 5‐6, 612-647
Abstract: In this paper we examine a comprehensive set of 2,499 UK IPOs launched between mid‐1975 and the end of 2004. We find compelling evidence of long run under‐performance that persists for between 36 and 60 months post‐flotation, depending on the precise method chosen to measure abnormal returns. Following Schultz (2003), we ask whether our results are consistent with ‘pseudo‐timing’. Equally‐weighted returns in calendar time provide further evidence of under‐performance, a result that favours the Loughran and Ritter (2000) behavioural timing hypothesis rather than the Schultz (2003) pseudo‐timing hypothesis. However, we show that this under‐performance is concentrated in AIM and USM stocks. When we measure value‐weighted returns in calendar time we find that abnormal returns are not significantly different from zero. Further analysis shows that, consistent with the findings of other studies, IPO under‐performance is concentrated in smaller firms.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:37:y:2010:i:5-6:p:612-647
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-686X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting is currently edited by P. F. Pope, A. W. Stark and M. Walker
More articles in Journal of Business Finance & Accounting from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().