The Limits to Minimum‐Variance Hedging
Richard Harris (),
Jian Shen and
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2010, vol. 37, issue 5‐6, 737-761
Abstract: In this paper, we compare the estimated minimum‐variance hedge ratios from a range of conditional hedging models with the ‘realized’ minimum variance hedge ratio constructed using intraday data. We show that the reduction in conditionally hedged portfolio variance falls far short of the ex post maximal reduction in variance obtained using the realized minimum variance hedge ratio. While this is partly due to systematic bias, correcting for this bias does little to improve hedging effectiveness. The poor performance of conditional hedging models is therefore more likely to be attributable to the unpredictability of the integrated hedge ratio.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: The Limits to Minimum-Variance Hedging (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:37:y:2010:i:5-6:p:737-761
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0306-686X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting is currently edited by P. F. Pope, A. W. Stark and M. Walker
More articles in Journal of Business Finance & Accounting from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().