The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique

Patrick Puhani

Journal of Economic Surveys, 2000, vol. 14, issue 1, 53-68

Abstract: This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman’s (1976, 1979) two‐step estimator for estimating selection models. Such models occur frequently in empirical work, especially in microeconometrics when estimating wage equations or consumer expenditures. It is shown that exploratory work to check for collinearity problems is strongly recommended before deciding on which estimator to apply. In the absence of collinearity problems, the full‐information maximum likelihood estimator is preferable to the limited‐information two‐step method of Heckman, although the latter also gives reasonable results. If, however, collinearity problems prevail, subsample OLS (or the Two‐Part Model) is the most robust amongst the simple‐to‐calculate estimators.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (515)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00104

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:14:y:2000:i:1:p:53-68

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0950-0804

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Economic Surveys from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().