A REVIEW AND COMPARISON OF TESTS OF CROSS‐SECTION INDEPENDENCE IN PANELS

Francesco Moscone and Elisa Tosetti

Journal of Economic Surveys, 2009, vol. 23, issue 3, 528-561

Abstract: Abstract In this paper we review and compare diagnostic tests of cross‐section independence in the disturbances of panel regression models. We examine tests based on the sample pairwise correlation coefficient or on its transformations, and tests based on the theory of spacings. The ultimate goal is to shed some light on the appropriate use of existing diagnostic tests for cross‐equation error correlation. Our discussion is supported by means of a set of Monte Carlo experiments and a small empirical study on health. Results show that tests based on the average of pairwise correlation coefficients work well when the alternative hypothesis is a factor model with non‐zero mean loadings. Tests based on spacings are powerful in identifying various forms of strong cross‐section dependence, but have low power when they are used to capture spatial correlation.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (72)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2008.00571.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:23:y:2009:i:3:p:528-561

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0950-0804

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Economic Surveys from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().