The Boundaries of the Firm: The Choice Between Stand‐Alone and Integrated Firms

Elazar Berkovitch, Ronen Israel and Efrat Tolkowsky

Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2006, vol. 15, issue 4, 821-851

Abstract: This study presents a theory of corporate structure selection. It outlines when economic units should be structured as stand‐alone firms versus an integrated firm (conglomerate). The theory suggests that an integrated firm better controls agency problems through yardstick competition between managers for project acceptance. However, this structure reduces the ability to receive division‐specific project information from the market. Based on this trade‐off, we show that divisions within a conglomerate have different characteristics and, thus, different valuations than “similar” stand‐alone firms. Our theory also explains differences in the required rate of return between stand‐alone firms and conglomerates and how they relate to relative valuations of conglomerates and “similar” stand‐alone firm. It also predicts when stock price reaction to divestiture and merger announcements will be positive or negative.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00119.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:821-851

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... ref=1058-6407&site=1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().