Firms' Stakeholders and the Costs of Transparency
Andres Almazan,
Javier Suarez and
Sheridan Titman
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2009, vol. 18, issue 3, 871-900
Abstract:
We develop a model of a firm whose production process requires it to initiate and nurture a relationship with its stakeholders. Because there are spillover benefits of being associated with a “winner,” the perceptions of stakeholders and potential stakeholders can affect firm value. Our analysis indicates that while transparency (i.e., generating information about a firm's quality) may improve the allocation of resources, a firm may have a higher ex ante value if information about its quality is not prematurely generated. Transparency costs arise because of asymmetric information regarding the extent to which stakeholders benefit from having a relationship with a high‐quality firm. These costs are higher when firms can undertake noncontractible innovative investments that enhance the value of their stakeholder relationships. Stakeholder effects of transparency are especially important for younger firms with less established track records.
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00232.x
Related works:
Chapter: Firms' Stakeholders and the Costs of Transparency (2007)
Working Paper: Firms' Stakeholders and the Costs of Transparency (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:18:y:2009:i:3:p:871-900
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... ref=1058-6407&site=1
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().