Hassle Costs: The Achilles' Heel of Price‐Matching Guarantees*
Morten Hviid and
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1999, vol. 8, issue 4, 489-521
We show that price‐matching guarantees can facilitate monopoly pricing only if firms automatically match prices. If consumers must instead request refunds (thereby incurring hassle costs), we find that any increase in equilibrium prices due to firms' price‐matching policies will be small; often, no price increase can be supported. In symmetric markets price‐matching guarantees cannot support any rise in prices, even if hassle costs are arbitrarily small In asymmetric markets, higher prices can be supported, but the prices fall well short of maximizing joint profits. Our model can explain why some firms adopt price‐matching guarantees while others do not.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:8:y:1999:i:4:p:489-521
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... ref=1058-6407&site=1
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().