Poison Put Bonds: An Analysis of Their Economic Role

Douglas O Cook and John C Easterwood

Journal of Finance, 1994, vol. 49, issue 5, 1905-20

Abstract: This article examines the effect of issuing debt with and without 'poison put' covenants on outstanding debt and equity claims for the period 1988 to 1989. The analysis shows that poison put covenants affect stockholders negatively and outstanding bondholders positively, while debt issued without such covenants has no effect. The study also finds a negative relationship between stock and bond returns for firms issuing poison put debt. These results are consistent with a 'mutual interest hypothesis,' which suggests that the issuance of poison put debt protects managers and, coincidentally, bondholders at the expense of stockholders. Copyright 1994 by American Finance Association.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1082%2819941 ... O%3B2-3&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:49:y:1994:i:5:p:1905-20

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().