Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models

Gurdip Bakshi, Charles Cao and Zhiwu Chen

Journal of Finance, 1997, vol. 52, issue 5, 2003-49

Abstract: Substantial progress has been made in developing more realistic option pricing models. Empirically, however, it is not known whether and by how much each generalization improves option pricing and hedging. The authors fill this gap by first deriving an option model that allows volatility, interest rates, and jumps to be stochastic. Using S&P 500 options, they examine several alternative models from three perspectives: (1) internal consistency of implied parameters/volatility with relevant time-series data, (2) out-of-sample pricing, and (3) hedging. Overall, incorporating stochastic volatility and jumps is important for pricing and internal consistency. But for hedging, modeling stochastic volatility alone yields the best performance. Copyright 1997 by American Finance Association.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (875)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1082%2819971 ... O%3B2-9&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models (1997)
Working Paper: Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:52:y:1997:i:5:p:2003-49

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().