Hostility in Takeovers: In the Eyes of the Beholder?
Journal of Finance, 2000, vol. 55, issue 6, 2599-2640
This paper examines whether hostile takeovers can be distinguished from friendly takeovers, empirically, based on accounting and stock performance data. Much has been made of this distinction in both the popular and the academic literature, where gains from hostile takeovers result from replacing incumbent managers and gains from friendly takeovers result from strategic synergies. Alternatively, hostility could reflect strategic choices made by the bidder or the target. Empirical tests show that most deals described as hostile in the press are not distinguishable from friendly deals in economic terms, except that hostile transactions involve publicity as part of the bargaining process. Copyright The American Finance Association 2000.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (224) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2000&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Hostility in Takeovers: In the Eyes of the Beholder? (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:55:y:2000:i:6:p:2599-2640
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().