Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps

Ravi Jagannathan and Tongshu Ma

Journal of Finance, 2003, vol. 58, issue 4, 1651-1683

Abstract: Green and Hollifield (1992) argue that the presence of a dominant factor would result in extreme negative weights in mean‐variance efficient portfolios even in the absence of estimation errors. In that case, imposing no‐short‐sale constraints should hurt, whereas empirical evidence is often to the contrary. We reconcile this apparent contradiction. We explain why constraining portfolio weights to be nonnegative can reduce the risk in estimated optimal portfolios even when the constraints are wrong. Surprisingly, with no‐short‐sale constraints in place, the sample covariance matrix performs as well as covariance matrix estimates based on factor models, shrinkage estimators, and daily data.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (624)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00580

Related works:
Working Paper: Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:4:p:1651-1683

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().