Do Tests of Capital Structure Theory Mean What They Say?

Ilya Strebulaev ()

Journal of Finance, 2007, vol. 62, issue 4, 1747-1787

Abstract: In the presence of frictions, firms adjust their capital structure infrequently. As a consequence, in a dynamic economy the leverage of most firms is likely to differ from the “optimum” leverage at the time of readjustment. This paper explores the empirical implications of this observation. I use a calibrated dynamic trade‐off model to simulate firms' capital structure paths. The results of standard cross‐sectional tests on these data are consistent with those reported in the empirical literature. In particular, the standard interpretation of some test results leads to the rejection of the underlying model. Taken together, the results suggest a rethinking of the way capital structure tests are conducted.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (318)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01256.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Tests of Capital Structure Theory Mean What They Say? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:62:y:2007:i:4:p:1747-1787

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().