Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Sticky or Discerning Money?
Clemens Sialm (),
Laura T. Starks and
Journal of Finance, 2015, vol. 70, issue 2, 805-838
type="main"> Participants in defined contribution (DC) retirement plans rarely adjust their portfolio allocations, suggesting that their investment choices and consequent money flows are sticky and not discerning. However, participants’ inertia could be offset by DC plan sponsors, who adjust the plan's investment options. We examine these countervailing influences on flows into U.S. mutual funds. We find that flows into funds from DC assets are more volatile and exhibit more performance sensitivity than non-DC flows, primarily due to adjustments to the investment options by the plan sponsors. Thus, DC retirement money is less sticky and more discerning than non-DC money.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Sticky or Discerning Money? (2014)
Working Paper: Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Sticky or Discerning Money? (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:70:y:2015:i:2:p:805-838
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().