WHEN ELECTIONS FAIL TO RESOLVE UNCERTAINTY: THE CASE OF THE 2016 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
Justin S. Cox and
Todd G. Griffith
Journal of Financial Research, 2019, vol. 42, issue 4, 735-756
In this article, we examine whether certain political election outcomes create, rather than resolve, uncertainty in financial markets. We posit that the market uncertainty associated with unanticipated election outcomes is not resolved before or on the election dates. To test this claim, we use the surprise outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election and two previous U.S. presidential elections as benchmarks. In contrast to prior elections, we find that the 2016 U.S. presidential election outcome did not resolve market uncertainty. Specifically, we show significant increases in transactions costs, adverse selection costs, and volatility in the days following the election date. We contribute to the literature by suggesting that unexpected elections can engender, rather than resolve, market uncertainty.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:42:y:2019:i:4:p:735-756
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0270-2592
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Research is currently edited by Jayant Kale and Gerald Gay
More articles in Journal of Financial Research from Southern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC., Southwestern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().