On regulation and excess reserves: The case of Basel III

Stephen Matteo Miller and Blake Hoarty ()

Journal of Financial Research, 2021, vol. 44, issue 2, 215-247

Abstract: Common explanations for the observed rise in excess bank reserves include payment of interest on reserves and liquidity regulations, but capital regulations may also matter. We show that a profit‐maximizing bank substitutes from higher risk‐weighted loans to lower risk‐weighted reserves and Treasuries if the risk‐based capital ratio, but not the leverage ratio, increases. Estimated treatment effects for “advanced approaches” bank holding companies, the focus of Basel III capital regulations, initially increased for reserves after the regulatory changes but later decreased when treatment effects for Treasuries increased as Treasury yields rose; treatment effects for loans became increasingly negative.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12239

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:44:y:2021:i:2:p:215-247

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0270-2592

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Research is currently edited by Jayant Kale and Gerald Gay

More articles in Journal of Financial Research from Southern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC., Southwestern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().