Regulation, Vertical Integration and Sabotage

Thomas Beard, David L. Kaserman and John Mayo

Journal of Industrial Economics, 2001, vol. 49, issue 3, 319-333

Abstract: We consider the incentive of a dominant firm that supplies a necessary input to a Bertrand‐competitive differentiated products downstream industry to: (1) vertically integrate forward, and (2) raise its downstream rivals’ costs through non‐price activities which we characterize generally as ‘sabotage’. We examine these incentives both in the absence and presence of a regulatory constraint on the upstream price. We find that, while an incentive for vertical integration is present regardless of the existence of the regulatory constraint, the incentive for sabotage emerges only in the presence of binding input price regulation. Welfare effects are also explored.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (50)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00152

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jindec:v:49:y:2001:i:3:p:319-333

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0022-1821

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Industrial Economics is currently edited by Pierre Regibeau, Yeon-Koo Che, Kenneth Corts, Thomas Hubbard, Patrick Legros and Frank Verboven

More articles in Journal of Industrial Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().