OBTAINING RESPONSES TO SENSITIVE QUESTIONS - CONVENTIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE VERSUS RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE TECHNIQUE

Ta Buchman and Ja Tracy

Journal of Accounting Research, 1982, vol. 20, issue 1, 263-271

Keywords: Questionnaires; Randomized response technique; Reluctance to answer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 M40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1982
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2490775.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:joares:v:20:y:1982:i:1:p:263-271

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0021-8456

DOI: 10.2307/2490775

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Research is currently edited by Philip G. Berger, Luzi Hail, Christian Leuz, Haresh Sapra, Douglas J. Skinner, Rodrigo Verdi and Regina Wittenberg Moerman

More articles in Journal of Accounting Research from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().