The Information in Management’s Expected Earnings Report Date: A Day Late, a Penny Short
Mark Bagnoli,
William Kross and
Susan G. Watts
Journal of Accounting Research, 2002, vol. 40, issue 5, 1275-1296
Abstract:
Since 1995, managers of thousands of firms have voluntarily disclosed the expected date of their firm’s next quarterly earnings announcement to Thomson Financial Services Inc. These disclosures are approximately 500% more accurate than the simple time–series expected report dates used in prior accounting research. These disclosures are also informative. On average, managers who miss their own expected date eventually report earnings that fall about one penny per share below consensus forecasts for each day of delay. Investors respond by sending the price of late–announcing stocks down at the missed expected report date and continue to send them down as the reporting delay lengthens, consistent with our “day late, penny short” result. Despite this, we find that the market response at the time earnings are announced still depends on whether the announcement is early, on time, or late relative to the firm’s own expected report date.
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (45)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.t01-1-00054
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:joares:v:40:y:2002:i:5:p:1275-1296
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0021-8456
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Accounting Research is currently edited by Philip G. Berger, Luzi Hail, Christian Leuz, Haresh Sapra, Douglas J. Skinner, Rodrigo Verdi and Regina Wittenberg Moerman
More articles in Journal of Accounting Research from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().