Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion

Jennifer R. Joe

Journal of Accounting Research, 2003, vol. 41, issue 1, 109-133

Abstract: In this study I use an experiment to examine why auditors are more likely to issue going–concern opinions when the client has been the subject of negative press coverage prior to the date of the audit opinion. I find no evidence that negative press coverage increases auditors’ perceptions of legal liability, as was suggested in the prior literature. I do find, however, that negative press coverage increases auditors’ perception of a client's bankruptcy probability and this, in turn, leads auditors to modify the audit opinion. Because the press coverage presented in this study provides no new information, the results suggest that auditors react too strongly to redundant information. This over–reaction can result in inefficient allocation of audit resources and can have deleterious affects on clients. Accordingly, policy makers, auditors and their clients might be interested in how auditors’ reliance on redundant information can be reduced.

Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00098

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:joares:v:41:y:2003:i:1:p:109-133

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0021-8456

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Research is currently edited by Philip G. Berger, Luzi Hail, Christian Leuz, Haresh Sapra, Douglas J. Skinner, Rodrigo Verdi and Regina Wittenberg Moerman

More articles in Journal of Accounting Research from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().