Limits to Political Capture: Evidence from Patent Grants, Disclosures, and Litigation

Christine Cuny, Mihir N. Mehta and Wanli Zhao

Journal of Accounting Research, 2025, vol. 63, issue 4, 1453-1492

Abstract: Substantial evidence suggests that regulatory agencies in the United States can be captured by the politicians who oversee them. We provide novel evidence of a federal agency in which capture is limited: the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Although patent applications from politically connected applicants are slightly more likely to be approved despite being of lower ex post quality, additional analyses suggest these outcomes are not indicative of capture. In particular, the disclosure quality of connected patents' legal claims increases more than unconnected patents during the review process, narrowing the scope of the patents and constraining the intellectual property rights. Furthermore, connected patents are no more likely than others to be litigated ex post, suggesting these patent grants are not spurious. Our findings provide insights into how the design of a regulator can limit the benefits that accrue to politically connected firms.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12607

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:joares:v:63:y:2025:i:4:p:1453-1492

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1475679x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Research is currently edited by Philip G. Berger, Anna Costello, Luzi Hail, Valeri Nikolaev, Haresh Sapra, Laurence van Lent and Regina Wittenberg Moerman

More articles in Journal of Accounting Research from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().