Out for the Count: A Social Scientist's Analysis of Unemployment Statistics in the UK
Paul Gregg
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 1994, vol. 157, issue 2, 253-270
Abstract:
The validity of UK unemployment statistics was the focus of intense debate through the 1980s and again in 1992. This mainly concerned whether they were open to politically motivated manipulation. to some extent this argument has missed a wider point. Frequent changes of coverage and consistency between sources of information which provide measures of unemployment have led to a paucity of data that are suitable for social scientific study with its implied costs to our understanding of unemployment over the last 15 years. It is hoped that an increasing reliance on specifically designed survey techniques, rather than measures based on benefit administration data, will overcome many of these problems for the 1990s. The design of the Labour Force Survey should take on board the questions raised by social scientists. In particular, the shortage of available work should be measured by the broader indicators of social distress as well as the identification of excess labour supply in the labour market.
Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2307/2983361
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:157:y:1994:i:2:p:253-270
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().