EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Analysis of cervical cancer mortality and incidence data from England and Wales: evidence of a beneficial effect of screening

Peter D. Sasieni and Joanna Adams

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2000, vol. 163, issue 2, 191-209

Abstract: Incidence and mortality rates for invasive cervical cancer in England and Wales have changed considerably since records began in 1950s. It is well known that cervical cancer rates show substantial birth cohort effects and these make the interpretation of secular trends difficult. Here the incidence data (from 1971) and mortality data (from 1950) are analysed by using generalized additive models. The goodness of fit is evaluated by using residual plots and scaled changes in deviance. The incidence of squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the cervix were analysed separately after making an adjustment for those with unknown histology. Although the age and cohort model provides an adequate description of the data up to the mid‐1980s, additional terms are required to model the more recent data. Reasonable fits are obtained by adding functions of calendar year since 1978 in each of three age bands. Estimates of the cohort effects obtained from the incidence of squamous cancer and mortality data are remarkably similar and fit with hypothesized effects of changing sexual norms on cervical cancer rates. Secular trends suggest that cervical screening had little effect on cervical cancer rates before the mid‐1980s and that since then the effect on mortality and incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix has been substantial whereas the effect on the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the cervix has been modest. Secular trends are greatest in younger women. They are minimal in women aged 70 years and over. If the secular trends are attributed to cervical screening, the models estimate that, as a result of screening, approximately 6000 fewer deaths occurred between 1991 and 1997 and that approximately 4000 fewer squamous cancers were diagnosed between 1989 and 1992.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00165

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:163:y:2000:i:2:p:191-209

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:163:y:2000:i:2:p:191-209