Investigating disease clusters: why, when and how?

Daniel Wartenberg

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2001, vol. 164, issue 1, 13-22

Abstract: The investigation of disease clusters, aggregations of a few to several cases of disease, remains a controversial issue in epidemiology and public health. Reported at the rate of more than three per day nationally, a response commands substantial resources. This paper considers whether scientists or public health officials should investigate disease clusters, when they should, and, if so, how. Part of the disparity in opinions arises from differing goals: trying to identify new carcinogens versus identifying situations in which people are at risk. There are also differences in investigation strategies: passive versus active. This paper suggests that a more active surveillance programme with occasional investigation may best meet the needs of the public while accommodating the limited resources of public health officials and some of the concerns of epidemiologists.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00181

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:164:y:2001:i:1:p:13-22

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().