Improved estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary response: a case‐study

Germán Rodríguez and Noreen Goldman

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2001, vol. 164, issue 2, 339-355

Abstract: During recent years, analysts have been relying on approximate methods of inference to estimate multilevel models for binary or count data. In an earlier study of random‐intercept models for binary outcomes we used simulated data to demonstrate that one such approximation, known as marginal quasi‐likelihood, leads to a substantial attenuation bias in the estimates of both fixed and random effects whenever the random effects are non‐trivial. In this paper, we fit three‐level random‐intercept models to actual data for two binary outcomes, to assess whether refined approximation procedures, namely penalized quasi‐likelihood and second‐order improvements to marginal and penalized quasi‐likelihood, also underestimate the underlying parameters. The extent of the bias is assessed by two standards of comparison: exact maximum likelihood estimates, based on a Gauss–Hermite numerical quadrature procedure, and a set of Bayesian estimates, obtained from Gibbs sampling with diffuse priors. We also examine the effectiveness of a parametric bootstrap procedure for reducing the bias. The results indicate that second‐order penalized quasi‐likelihood estimates provide a considerable improvement over the other approximations, but all the methods of approximate inference result in a substantial underestimation of the fixed and random effects when the random effects are sizable. We also find that the parametric bootstrap method can eliminate the bias but is computationally very intensive.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00206

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:164:y:2001:i:2:p:339-355

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().