A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data
James R. Carpenter,
Michael G. Kenward and
Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2006, vol. 169, issue 3, 571-584
Abstract:
Summary. Multiple imputation is now a well‐established technique for analysing data sets where some units have incomplete observations. Provided that the imputation model is correct, the resulting estimates are consistent. An alternative, weighting by the inverse probability of observing complete data on a unit, is conceptually simple and involves fewer modelling assumptions, but it is known to be both inefficient (relative to a fully parametric approach) and sensitive to the choice of weighting model. Over the last decade, there has been a considerable body of theoretical work to improve the performance of inverse probability weighting, leading to the development of ‘doubly robust’ or ‘doubly protected’ estimators. We present an intuitive review of these developments and contrast these estimators with multiple imputation from both a theoretical and a practical viewpoint.
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00407.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:169:y:2006:i:3:p:571-584
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().