Accounting for spatial confounding in epidemiological studies with individual‐level exposures: An exposure‐penalized spline approach

Jennifer F. Bobb, Maricela F. Cruz, Stephen J. Mooney, Adam Drewnowski, David Arterburn and Andrea J. Cook

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2022, vol. 185, issue 3, 1271-1293

Abstract: In the presence of unmeasured spatial confounding, spatial models may actually increase (rather than decrease) bias, leading to uncertainty as to how they should be applied in practice. We evaluated spatial modelling approaches through simulation and application to a big data electronic health record study. Whereas the risk of bias was high for purely spatial exposures (e.g. built environment), we found very limited potential for increased bias for individual‐level exposures that cluster spatially (e.g. smoking status). We also proposed a novel exposure‐penalized spline approach that selects the degree of spatial smoothing to explain spatial variability in the exposure. This approach appeared promising for efficiently reducing spatial confounding bias.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12831

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:185:y:2022:i:3:p:1271-1293

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().