Approximate Likelihoods for Generalized Linear Errors‐in‐variables Models
John J. Hanfelt and
Kung‐Yee Liang
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1997, vol. 59, issue 3, 627-637
Abstract:
When measurement error is present in covariates, it is well known that naïvely fitting a generalized linear model results in inconsistent inferences. Several methods have been proposed to adjust for measurement error without making undue distributional assumptions about the unobserved true covariates. Stefanski and Carroll focused on an unbiased estimating function rather than a likelihood approach. Their estimating function, known as the conditional score, exists for logistic regression models but has two problems: a poorly behaved Wald test and multiple solutions. They suggested a heuristic procedure to identify the best solution that works well in practice but has little theoretical support compared with maximum likelihood estimation. To help to resolve these problems, we propose a conditional quasi‐likelihood to accompany the conditional score that provides an alternative to Wald's test and successfully identifies the consistent solution in large samples.
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00087
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:59:y:1997:i:3:p:627-637
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9868
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B is currently edited by P. Fryzlewicz and I. Van Keilegom
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().