Calibrating the excess mass and dip tests of modality

M.‐Y. Cheng and P. Hall

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1998, vol. 60, issue 3, 579-589

Abstract: Nonparametric tests of modality are a distribution‐free way of assessing evidence about inhomogeneity in a population, provided that the potential sub populations are sufficiently well separated. They include the excess mass and dip tests, which are equivalent in univariate settings and are alternatives to the bandwidth test. Only very conservative forms of the excess mass and dip tests are available at presently, however, and for that reason they are generally not competitive with the bandwidth test. In the present paper we develop a practical approach to calibrating the excess mass and dip tests to improve their level accuracy and power substantially. Our method exploits the fact that the limiting distribution of the excess mass statistic under the null hypothesis depends on unknowns only through a constant, which may be estimated. Our calibrated test exploits this fact and is shown to have greater power and level accuracy than the bandwidth test has. The latter tends to be quite conservative, even in an asymptotic sense. Moreover, the calibrated test avoids difficulties that the bandwidth test has with spurious modes in the tails, which often must be discounted through subjective intervention of the experimenter.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00141

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:60:y:1998:i:3:p:579-589

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9868

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B is currently edited by P. Fryzlewicz and I. Van Keilegom

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().