On the robustness of weighted methods for fitting models to case–control data

Alastair Scott and Chris Wild

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 2002, vol. 64, issue 2, 207-219

Abstract: Summary. We compare the robustness under model misspecification of two approaches to fitting logistic regression models with unmatched case–control data. One is the standard survey approach based on weighted versions of population estimating equations. The other is the likelihood‐based approach that is standard in medical applications. The conventional view is that the (less efficient) survey‐weighted approach leads to greater robustness. We conclude that this view is not always justified.

Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00333

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:64:y:2002:i:2:p:207-219

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9868

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B is currently edited by P. Fryzlewicz and I. Van Keilegom

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().