Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions
Susan Athey,
Guido Imbens and
Stefan Wager
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 2018, vol. 80, issue 4, 597-623
Abstract:
There are many settings where researchers are interested in estimating average treatment effects and are willing to rely on the unconfoundedness assumption, which requires that the treatment assignment be as good as random conditional on pretreatment variables. The unconfoundedness assumption is often more plausible if a large number of pretreatment variables are included in the analysis, but this can worsen the performance of standard approaches to treatment effect estimation. We develop a method for debiasing penalized regression adjustments to allow sparse regression methods like the lasso to be used for √n‐consistent inference of average treatment effects in high dimensional linear models. Given linearity, we do not need to assume that the treatment propensities are estimable, or that the average treatment effect is a sparse contrast of the outcome model parameters. Rather, in addition to standard assumptions used to make lasso regression on the outcome model consistent under 1‐norm error, we require only overlap, i.e. that the propensity score be uniformly bounded away from 0 and 1. Procedurally, our method combines balancing weights with a regularized regression adjustment.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (92)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12268
Related works:
Working Paper: Approximate Residual Balancing: De-Biased Inference of Average Treatment Effects in High Dimensions (2018) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:80:y:2018:i:4:p:597-623
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9868
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B is currently edited by P. Fryzlewicz and I. Van Keilegom
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().