EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing Kaplan–Meier curves with delayed treatment effects: applications in immunotherapy trials

Philippe Flandre and John O’Quigley

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 2019, vol. 68, issue 4, 915-939

Abstract: We consider a comparison of Kaplan–Meier curves from clinical trials in which there may be a delayed treatment effect. Any such delay takes us outside the umbrella of a proportional hazards structure and therefore outside the setting in which the log‐rank test would be optimal. The approach of Chauvel and O’Quigley based on Brownian motion approximations enables the construction of powerful tests in situations of non‐proportionality and, in particular, a powerful test in the situation of delayed effect. The power of this test is seen to be very close to that of the most powerful test, which, however, is unavailable in practice. We show that the test is unbiased and consistent under general conditions. Under the null, we obtain identical large sample behaviour to the log‐rank test so the type 1 error is correctly controlled. Under proportional hazards departures from the null we obtain results that indicate a manageable loss in power compared with the log‐rank test. The usual sample size calculations can still provide a useful guide. Support for the theoretical findings are provided by simulations as well as illustrations from three immunotherapy clinical trials.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12345

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:4:p:915-939

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9876

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C is currently edited by R. Chandler and P. W. F. Smith

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:4:p:915-939