Case‐only trees and random forests for exploring genotype‐specific treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with dichotomous end points
James Y. Dai and
Michael LeBlanc
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 2019, vol. 68, issue 5, 1371-1391
Abstract:
Discovering gene–treatment interactions in clinical trials is of rising interest in the era of precision medicine. Non‐parametric statistical learning methods such as trees and random forests are useful tools for building prediction rules. We introduce trees and random forests to the recently proposed case‐only approach for discovering gene–treatment interactions and estimating marker‐specific treatment effects for a dichotomous trial's end points. The motivational example is a case–control genetic association study in the prostate cancer prevention trial, which tested the hypothesis whether finasteride can prevent prostate cancer. We compare this novel approach with the interaction tree method previously proposed. Because of the modelling simplicity—directly targeting at interaction—and the statistical efficiency of the case‐only approach, case‐only trees and random forests yield more accurate prediction of heterogeneous treatment effects and a better measure of variable importance, relative to the interaction tree method which uses data from both cases and controls. Application of the proposed case‐only trees and random forests to the prostate cancer prevention trial study yielded a discovery of genotypes that may influence the prevention effect of finasteride.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12366
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:5:p:1371-1391
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9876
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C is currently edited by R. Chandler and P. W. F. Smith
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().