Reduced bias for respondent‐driven sampling: accounting for non‐uniform edge sampling probabilities in people who inject drugs in Mauritius

Miles Q. Ott, Krista J. Gile, Matthew T. Harrison, Lisa G. Johnston and Joseph W. Hogan

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 2019, vol. 68, issue 5, 1411-1429

Abstract: People who inject drugs are an important population to study to reduce transmission of blood‐borne illnesses including human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. We estimate the human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C prevalence among people who inject drugs in Mauritius. Respondent‐driven sampling (RDS), which is a widely adopted link tracing sampling design used to collect samples from hard‐to‐reach human populations, was used to collect this sample. The random‐walk approximation underlying many common RDS estimators assumes that each social relationship (edge) in the underlying social network has an equal probability of being traced in the collection of the sample. This assumption does not hold in practice. We show that certain RDS estimators are sensitive to the violation of this assumption. To address this limitation in current methodology, and the effect that it may have on prevalence estimates, we present a new method for improving RDS prevalence estimators using estimated edge inclusion probabilities, and we apply this to data from Mauritius.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12353

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:5:p:1411-1429

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9876

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C is currently edited by R. Chandler and P. W. F. Smith

More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().