Hengtao Zhang and
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 2021, vol. 70, issue 5, 1281-1298
Rerandomization has recently attracted more attention in the literature randomized experiments. It leverages covariate information of participants to achieve a well‐balanced allocation, and thus improves the efficiency of inference. However, by only considering covariate information, it may lead to potential ethical issues in clinical trials as a large number of patients might be assigned to the inferior treatment arm. To mitigate this issue, we propose a response‐adaptive rerandomization scheme by incorporating response information for two‐arm comparative clinical trials. Not only is our method applicable to both continuous and binary outcomes, but it also demonstrates desirable statistical and ethical properties. Extensive simulation studies are performed to illustrate the practicality and superiority of our approach.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:70:y:2021:i:5:p:1281-1298
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-9876
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C is currently edited by R. Chandler and P. W. F. Smith
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C from Royal Statistical Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().