Geography, productivity, and trade: Does selection explain why some locations are more productive than others?
Antonio Accetturo (),
Valter Di Giacinto,
Giacinto Micucci and
Marcello Pagnini ()
Journal of Regional Science, 2018, vol. 58, issue 5, 949-979
Two main hypotheses are usually put forward to explain the productivity advantages of larger cities: agglomeration economies and firm selection. Combes et al. (2012) propose an empirical approach to disentangle these two effects and find no impact of selection on local productivity differences. We theoretically show that selection effects do emerge when heterogeneous trade costs and the different spatial scale at which agglomeration and selection may work are properly taken into account. Our empirical findings confirm that agglomeration effects play a major role. However, they also show a substantial increase in the importance of the selection effect.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Geography, productivity and trade: does selection explain why some locations are more productive than others? (2013)
Working Paper: Geography, Productivity and Trade: Does Selection Explain Why Some Locations Are More Productive than Others? (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:58:y:2018:i:5:p:949-979
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0022-4146
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Regional Science is currently edited by Marlon G. Boarnet, Matthew Kahn and Mark D. Partridge
More articles in Journal of Regional Science from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().