A Meta‐Analytic Review of Supply Chain Risk Management: Assessing Buffering and Bridging Strategies and Firm Performance

Pam Manhart, James K. Summers and Jennifer Blackhurst

Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2020, vol. 56, issue 3, 66-87

Abstract: Supply chain risk management has received considerable attention as firms experience more frequent and severe impact disruptions. We meta‐analytically test the Bode et al. (2011) framework of buffering and bridging supply chain risk management strategies to determine their effect on supply chain risk management. We analyze the supply chain risk management literature to find that both buffering and bridging strategies contribute to supply chain risk management. We also address the benefit of supply chain risk management. Results indicate that supply chain risk management provides a strong contribution to overall firm performance. Additionally, we identify cultural differences of these relationships. Although supply chain risk management strategies may be applied universally, their efficacy varies by culture. In conclusion, we identify and provide guidance for future work.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12219

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:56:y:2020:i:3:p:66-87

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1523-2409

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Supply Chain Management is currently edited by Lisa Ellram, Craig Carter and Chad Autry

More articles in Journal of Supply Chain Management from Institute for Supply Management
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().