EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Weyl families of transformed boundary pairs

Rytis Juršėnas

Mathematische Nachrichten, 2023, vol. 296, issue 8, 3411-3448

Abstract: Let (L,Γ)$(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma )$ be an isometric boundary pair associated with a closed symmetric linear relation T in a Krein space H$\mathfrak {H}$. Let MΓ$M_\Gamma$ be the Weyl family corresponding to (L,Γ)$(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma )$. We cope with two main topics. First, since MΓ$M_\Gamma$ need not be (generalized) Nevanlinna, the characterization of the closure and the adjoint of a linear relation MΓ(z)$M_\Gamma (z)$, for some z∈C∖R$z\in \mathbb {C}\setminus \mathbb {R}$, becomes a nontrivial task. Regarding MΓ(z)$M_\Gamma (z)$ as the (Shmul'yan) transform of zI$zI$ induced by Γ, we give conditions for the equality in MΓ(z)¯⊆MΓ¯(z)¯$\overline{M_\Gamma (z)}\subseteq \overline{M_{\overline{\Gamma }}(z)}$ to hold and we compute the adjoint MΓ¯(z)∗$M_{\overline{\Gamma }}(z)^*$. As an application, we ask when the resolvent set of the main transform associated with a unitary boundary pair for T+$T^+$ is nonempty. Based on the criterion for the closeness of MΓ(z)$M_\Gamma (z)$, we give a sufficient condition for the answer. From this result it follows, for example, that, if T is a standard linear relation in a Pontryagin space, then the Weyl family MΓ$M_\Gamma$ corresponding to a boundary relation Γ for T+$T^+$ is a generalized Nevanlinna family; a similar conclusion is already known if T is an operator. In the second topic, we characterize the transformed boundary pair (L′,Γ′)$(\mathfrak {L}^\prime ,\Gamma ^\prime )$ with its Weyl family MΓ′$M_{\Gamma ^\prime }$. The transformation scheme is either Γ′=ΓV−1$\Gamma ^\prime =\Gamma V^{-1}$ or Γ′=VΓ$\Gamma ^\prime =V\Gamma$ with suitable linear relations V. Results in this direction include but are not limited to: a 1‐1 correspondence between (L,Γ)$(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma )$ and (L′,Γ′)$(\mathfrak {L}^\prime ,\Gamma ^\prime )$; the formula for MΓ′−MΓ$M_{\Gamma ^\prime }-M_\Gamma$, for an ordinary boundary triple and a standard unitary operator V (first scheme); construction of a quasi boundary triple from an isometric boundary triple (L,Γ0,Γ1)$(\mathfrak {L},\Gamma _0,\Gamma _1)$ with kerΓ=T$\ker \Gamma =T$ and T0=T0∗$T_0=T^*_0$ (second scheme, Hilbert space case).

Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.202100262

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:mathna:v:296:y:2023:i:8:p:3411-3448

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0025-584X

Access Statistics for this article

Mathematische Nachrichten is currently edited by Robert Denk

More articles in Mathematische Nachrichten from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bla:mathna:v:296:y:2023:i:8:p:3411-3448