Divergence and Convergence: New and Shifting Paradigms in Comparative Economic History

Simon Ville

Australian Economic History Review, 2015, vol. 55, issue 1, 80-94

Abstract: type="main">

Our understanding of comparative economic development has been heightened by recent advances in the historical literature, particularly in the Great Divergence debate. Broad geographical comparisons, extended time periods, and the diverse and contested tools of measurement have all enriched the context of the comparative literature. Revisiting the discussion of causality – long-term preconditions versus shorter-term contingencies – provides additional insights into the volition of human actors, especially households and governments. It also helps to unpack the nature of ‘institutions’, a term that has suffered from bifurcation into good or bad and whose deeper components have been insufficiently analysed.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/aehr.12059 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ozechr:v:55:y:2015:i:1:p:80-94

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0004-8992

Access Statistics for this article

Australian Economic History Review is currently edited by Stephen L Morgan and Martin Shanahan

More articles in Australian Economic History Review from Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().