AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO EXPLAINING BARGAINING BEHAVIOUR IN SIMPLE SEQUENTIAL GAMES

Chun‐Lei Yang, Joachim Weimann and Atanasios Mitropoulos

Pacific Economic Review, 2006, vol. 11, issue 2, 201-221

Abstract: Abstract. For simple sequential games, the payoff structure has certain bargaining power implication. Intuitively, certain actions may have the effect of the carrot and the stick as sanctioning means. Fair outcomes can be alternatively viewed as the consequence of their presence. Experimental data on various games are used to test the hypothesis of carrot and stick behaviour. We show that our stick and carrot heuristic neatly captures puzzling phenomena in a wide class of simple sequential games. The results support the view that punishing subjects are not worse off than myopic pay‐off maximizers as long as subjects are involved in a repeated strangers scheme.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0106.2006.00310.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:11:y:2006:i:2:p:201-221

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1361-374X

Access Statistics for this article

Pacific Economic Review is currently edited by Kenneth S. Chan and Yin-wong Cheung

More articles in Pacific Economic Review from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().