Budgeting for Mandatory Spending: Prologue to Reform

Marvin Phaup

Public Budgeting & Finance, 2019, vol. 39, issue 1, 24-44

Abstract: This paper identifies a feature of the federal budget process that, consistent with the findings of behavioral research, increases the difficulty for policymakers of restraining the growth of mandatory spending to sustainable rates: budgetary accounting. Specifically, use of cash‐basis accounting, on‐budget payment accounts, and a narrow definition of debt defers recognition of the cost of mandatory spending until benefits are payable and politically unavoidable. Acting to control “future” costs is cognitively more difficult for decision‐makers than addressing cost now as obligated. The paper proposes a trial of alternative budgetary accounting for mandatory spending that saliently recognizes cost as it accrues.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12210

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:39:y:2019:i:1:p:24-44

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0275-1100

Access Statistics for this article

Public Budgeting & Finance is currently edited by Philip Joyce and William Simonsen

More articles in Public Budgeting & Finance from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().