Turning Up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation
Carolyn M. Hendriks,
John S. Dryzek and
Christian Hunold
Political Studies, 2007, vol. 55, issue 2, 362-383
Abstract:
Two forum types have featured prominently in deliberative practice: (1) forums involving partisans (such as key ‘stakeholders’) and (2) forums involving non‐partisans (such as ‘lay citizens’). Drawing on deliberative theory and cases from Germany, we explore the relative merits of these forum types in terms of deliberative capacity, legitimacy and political impact. The two types offer deliberative governance something different. Non‐partisan forums such as citizens' juries or consensus conferences rate favorably in deliberative capacity, but can fall short when it comes to external legitimacy and policy impact. Contrary to expectations, partisan forums can also encounter substantial legitimation and impact problems. How can designed forums contribute to deliberative democratization, given that partisanship is an inevitable fact of politics? We offer some suggestions about how deliberative theory and practice might better accommodate the reality of partisanship, while securing benefits revealed in non‐partisan forums.
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:polstu:v:55:y:2007:i:2:p:362-383
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0032-3217
Access Statistics for this article
Political Studies is currently edited by Matthew Festenstein and Martin Smith
More articles in Political Studies from Political Studies Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().