On the Confusion between Ideal and Non‐ideal in Recent Debates on Global Justice

Lea Ypi

Political Studies, 2010, vol. 58, issue 3, 536-555

Abstract: This article assesses two contending global theories of justice (cosmopolitanism and statism) in light of the role that ideal and non‐ideal considerations should play in political theory. It starts with a distinction between ideal and non‐ideal and it proceeds to show how both statists and cosmopolitans are ideal when non‐ideal considerations should prevail and how both are non‐ideal when ideal theorising is required. This view is assessed with reference to two issues on which statists and cosmopolitans appear particularly divided: the relevance of states and the principles of global justice. With regard to the former, the article shows that the discussion on states is ideal (discussing the place of special associative relations in normative justifications of distributive equality) when it should be non‐ideal (emphasising the role of states as the most relevant agents of justice in real‐world circumstances). On the second issue, it illustrates how the discussion on principles is non‐ideal (limited to assessing the consequences of global poverty in unfavourable conditions) when it should be ideal (investigating the grounds of injustice at the appropriately fundamental level). The article concludes by sketching an alternative analysis of global justice which is able to accommodate some statist and cosmopolitan concerns but which avoids the criticisms that each theory usually attracts.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00794.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:polstu:v:58:y:2010:i:3:p:536-555

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0032-3217

Access Statistics for this article

Political Studies is currently edited by Matthew Festenstein and Martin Smith

More articles in Political Studies from Political Studies Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().