Ownership by Agreement
Peter Lindsay
Political Studies, 2015, vol. 63, issue 4, 935-950
Abstract:
type="main">
This article proposes a way of looking at ownership in which the central conceptual feature is the agreement that brings ownership into existence. On this understanding, ownership is a social fact, and as such derives its legitimacy from the extent to which people living under it give it their uncoerced consent. While any particular system's substantive features can certainly be judged according to independent moral considerations, these considerations would necessarily be secondary to the facts surrounding the agreement. In rooting legitimacy to consent, the argument runs parallel to both contractualist moral philosophy and ‘externalist’ rights claims, but, as is demonstrated in this article, differs from both in its emphasis on the conceptual centrality of agreement. The latter half of the article explores how this understanding of ownership shifts the grounds for what counts as a legitimate right of property, and then offers a few substantive conclusions regarding particular property rights and the nature of the moral obligations that systems of ownership (so conceived) both create and nullify.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9248.12138 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:polstu:v:63:y:2015:i:4:p:935-950
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0032-3217
Access Statistics for this article
Political Studies is currently edited by Matthew Festenstein and Martin Smith
More articles in Political Studies from Political Studies Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().