Should an Online Retailer Penalize Its Independent Sellers for Stockout?

Wenqiang Xiao and Yi Xu

Production and Operations Management, 2018, vol. 27, issue 6, 1124-1132

Abstract: We consider an online retailer selling a seasonal product provided by an independent third†party seller who has superior information about the demand potential of the product. The online retailer receives customer orders and then sends the orders to the seller for fulfillment, using pre†installed capacity. The supplier privately installs capacity prior to the selling season. The online retailer faces the challenge to accomplish two goals: to incentivize the seller to install the right level of capacity and to extract full surplus from the seller. We show that the commonly used commission contracts in online retailing cannot effectively allow the online retailer to accomplish the two goals to achieve the first†best outcome. We then show that the retailer can effectively accomplish the two goals to achieve the first†best, using a lost†sale penalty contract which has three components: a fixed fee, a commission and a lost†sale penalty which will be charged to the seller if a lost sale occurs.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12859

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:27:y:2018:i:6:p:1124-1132

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://onlinelibrary ... 1111/(ISSN)1937-5956

Access Statistics for this article

Production and Operations Management is currently edited by Kalyan Singhal

More articles in Production and Operations Management from Production and Operations Management Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().