Economics at your fingertips  

The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth

Mark Partridge

Papers in Regional Science, 2010, vol. 89, issue 3, 513-536

Abstract: The new economic geography (NEG) has become a mainstay of regional science in the last two decades, as signified by the awarding of Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize. Yet, most American regional scientists and urban/regional economists do not use NEG in determining regional growth patterns. Instead, they rely on factors such as natural amenity migration, whose roots lie back to the work of Philip Graves in the mid 1970s. Conversely, two of the world's leading economic geographers - Allen Scott and Michael Storper - have strongly argued that job availability not household amenities have determined US regional dynamics. Given the disparity of views over the largest developed economy in the world, we hold a competition to determine which of these leading contenders accurately predict US interregional growth dynamics over the last 40-60 years. The runaway winner of the duel is natural amenity led growth with the crown going to Graves. Implications are drawn for both empirical research and EU economic integration. Copyright (c) 2010 the author(s). Journal compilation (c) 2010 RSAI.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (80) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Papers in Regional Science is currently edited by Jouke van Dijk

More articles in Papers in Regional Science from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().

Page updated 2018-06-29
Handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:89:y:2010:i:3:p:513-536